Strict Censorship Policies of Google Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Strict Censorship Policies of Google - Case Study ExampleThe worlds largest bet engine thusly announced redirecting to an uncensored version located in Hong Kong in the hopes of circumventing mainland Chinas fair plays which only heightened Chinese officials ire. Furthermore, regardless of Googles act of leaving China, it remained to be a far enemy from the Haidu, Chinas most popular search engine. In the same vein, Google did not lose as much receipts as the Chinese market represented only a small calculate of what comprised the company (Heft and Barboza). As reported by the prevalently government lenient news agency, Xinhua, the government sees that regulation on the Internet is a sovereign issue and that Google has no right to attempt or to impose its protest standard on what the government should and should not censor (Na, Yunlu, and Hao, par. 5). There seems to be a great contrariety between the imagination of human rights as viewed in a Western concept especially among Americans and the preventative of Chinese law which majority of its citizens tend to dismiss. To reiterate, it is difficult to point out spates rights when they are in particular unaware that such rights do exist.The worlds largest search engine then announced redirecting to an uncensored version located in Hong Kong in the hopes of circumventing mainland Chinas laws which only heightened Chinese officials ire. Furthermore, regardless of Googles act of leaving China, it remained to be a far competitor from the Haidu, Chinas most popular search engine. In the same vein, Google did not lose as much revenue as the Chinese market represented only a small fraction of what comprised the company (Heft and Barboza). As reported by the prevalently government lenient news agency, Xinhua, the government sees that regulation on the Internet is a sovereign issue and that Google has no right to attempt or to impose its own standard on what the government should and should not censor (Na, Yun lu, and Hao, par. 5). There seems to be a great disparity between the conception of human rights as viewed in a Western concept especially among Americans and, the encumbrance of Chinese law which majority of its citizens tend to dismiss. To reiterate, it is difficult to point out peoples rights when they are in fact unaware that such rights do exist. A countrys business climate must be understood by a business professional in order to have a great perspective on how to conduct ones self and how to carry out ones business in a certain location. This would be applicable on specific matters as people and cultures are diverse. More than this, laws are also an integral part that must be kept in mind to avoid complications that could lead to lawsuits and legal dilemmas. The instant case presents us with two sides of an argument where a companys very own principle goes against a countrys law and regulations. What whitethorn be a common practice in one country may be perfectly prohibited in another and where a company cannot make amends with this fact, then there is of necessity the meandering situation where things are bound not to work out.